If you want to prevent yourself from exploding into anger, take a walk
around the block instead. That folk
wisdom was promulgated regularly in pre-21st Century America. People clearly believed that exercise could
cool down a hot head. What might cause
that transformation? Is it merely that
incipient anger’s physical tension is discharged by the physical act of
walking, or is it something else?
Emily E. Bernstein and Richard J. McNally (2017) wanted to understand
more precisely the link between emotion and exercise. To do so, they recruited 95 subjects, ages 18
to 36 who visited the psychology lab three times, and who had been instructed
to refrain from all strenuous activity for at least 12 hours before
arriving. Baseline measurements were
taken regarding the subjects’ physical fitness, demographics, moods, traits, emotional responses, and exercise habits.
They also completed several self-report questionnaires concerning their
tendencies relevant to rumination, depression, anxiety, and stress. At each visit, the subjects were assigned in
a counterbalanced fashion to 25 minutes of resting, stretching, or moderately
intense cycling. After the activity,
their attentional control was tested, they were administered stressors (having
to solve verbal puzzles 30% of which were unsolvable and having to perform a
serial subtraction task while being told that were erring), and they completed
questionnaires about their emotional responses.
Finally, the subjects performed a number of cognitive tasks.
As one would expect, Bernstein and McNally found that subjects who
ruminated the most after being stressed, experienced more persistent and more
intense negative emotion than did those who ruminated less. But persons who fretfully ruminated much and
who also had cycled were less negatively impacted. Please note that cycling preceded the
stressor, meaning that the moderately intense exercise amounted to a kind of
stress inoculation against later upset.
The aforementioned folk wisdom about exercise and emotion really was
not addressed by the study in question.
There certainly is a world of difference between sensing your own
incipient anger and physically acting literally to distance yourself from it,
compared to being stressed by being administered unsolvable verbal puzzles and
being given negative feedback about your performance. At minimum, in the former situation, you can
act with full autonomy and in the latter, you are reacting to control exerted
by someone else. But the most important
difference is that the folk wisdom implies that exercise during and just after
the stress provides tension reduction.
By contrast, the Emily E. Bernstein and Richard J. McNally research suggests that
exercise before stress is protective.
To my way of thinking, however, there is no significant contradiction
here. Exercise confers benefits to our
physical and mental health regardless of whether the exercise occurs before,
during, or after the stressor. Physical
fitness usually is achieved through a mindful approach to health. In order to attain and maintain fitness, one
must think through what needs to be done and actually perform the necessary
behaviors consistently through the good and bad times. That lesson is implicit in the Bernstein and McNally research just reviewed here. Similarly, when stress
mounts, the individual needs to physically act to reduce tension at that very
moment — the folk wisdom with which we began this post.
Reference:
Bernstein, Emily E. and McNally, Richard J. (2017). Acute Aerobic Exercise Hastens Emotional
Recovery From a Subsequent Stressor.
Health Psychology, March 9th , No
Pagination Specified. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000482
No comments:
Post a Comment