As
you experience virtually every day, there is no shortage of expert advice about
what you should do to become healthier.
Most “experts” sincerely believe that they know what is “good” for
you. And most are intent on having you
embrace the health plan that they have developed.
Unfortunately,
most experts also become so wedded to their method that they unwittingly ignore
the fact that they do not know you and, so, they do not know your idiosyncratic
strengths, weaknesses, and circumstances.
Of course, if asked, any sensible one of them would readily accept that
you are a “special case;” it’s just that they have content to deliver and are
blinded by their devotion to it.
Moreover, that blindness afflicts many experts regardless of their
profession or skill.
Although
I too am vulnerable to expert blindness, I continually struggle to minimize
it. That is why my focus is much less on
promoting any given content and more on facilitating your understanding and
application of personalized health-relevant processes. Although I am in the minority in that regard,
there certainly are other psychologists who share my beliefs. Most of the rest of this blog will
extrapolate from the work of two like-minded ones: Tim Gomersall and Anna Madill.
Gomersall
and Madill (2015) underscore the health-relevant importance of an individual’s
experience of time and space. (For our
purposes, read "space" as "place.") You have a history of
behaving as you do and that history has been enacted in certain spaces. Similarly, you are creating a history every
day. Both of these—your past and
“current” histories—profoundly influence what you are doing and what you will
do. A central tenet of the
aforementioned psychologists is that your particular times and spaces are
interwoven and unique, and, therefore, unappreciated by most people who seek to
“help” you. They explain their views
using diabetes as an example.
One
issue concerned the patient’s assessments of real-life experiences preceding or
following their diabetes diagnosis. The
investigator’s noted that the patients’ experiences often were different from
what doctors had suggested or predicted.
Those discrepancies, in turn, often caused the diabetics either to
reevaluate their past to make it consistent with the doctors’ information or to
reject the information instead. The
second issue involved ways in which diabetes affected the patients’ times and
spaces. As one would expect, with
increased illness severity, more and more limitations became obvious. I offer as an example that a given person
with diabetes might spend more time preparing unprocessed foods and eating at
home, rather than at restaurants, to control his blood sugars and general
nutrition. The final issue centered upon
the patients’ motivations to handle the limitations that did arise. Some, for instance, were driven by an intense
effort to deny their deficits while others accepted and tried to adaptively
manage them.
The
report by Gomersall and Madill was directed at health care professionals. They wanted to encourage them to carefully
consider the particular realities of their patients’ illnesses in terms of time
and space, and to tailor their treatments accordingly. In this blog, my purpose is to have you think
about how your own times and spaces impact your health. Whenever you encounter health-related
information, whether provided by me or someone else, you will do well to frame
it in terms of your unique experiences of time and space. For instance, think about the time and space
tolls required to apply the information provided, and the time and space
benefits that could result if you apply information that is valid and
health-promoting. Know that your past
and current experiences of time and space will make you either more or less
receptive to the proffered information.
Ensure that you don’t blindly accept information simply because an
expert told it to you. On the other
hand, do not summarily dismiss it either.
Reference
Gomersall,
T. & Madill, A. (2015). Chronotope
disruption as a sensitizing concept for understanding chronic illness
narratives. Health Psychology, 34,4,
407-416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000151
No comments:
Post a Comment