Some trying circumstances seem interminable. Many varieties
of experience can evoke that feeling. You, for example, could be
unemployed, at war with your spouse, or be unable to lose weight no matter how
hard you try. Everyone at some time suffers an unfortunate circumstance
that they feel never will end. But could some people be more vulnerable
to perceiving a trial as never-ending?
Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, Özlem Ayduk, and Oliver P. John (2016)
investigated trying circumstances in terms of “temporal distancing” which, as
you might guess, refers to framing upsetting experiences within a long-distance
context. For instance, an unemployed temporal distancer would be a
person who, knowing that she has a good previous work record, is highly
qualified, and is determined to do all necessary to find a job, sincerely
believes that gainful employment is just a matter of time.
As expected, the investigators found that persons high in temporal
distancing not only regarded their unfortunate circumstances as time-limited,
but they also understood their negative thoughts and emotions in the same
time-limited fashion. Accordingly, the negatives “stung” less.
Moreover, consistent with their greater hopefulness, high temporal distancers
experienced greater confidence in their abilities to actively problem solve and
to manage their challenging emotions.
Given that trying circumstances are a common feature of our
existence, no one would be surprised to learn that high temporal distancers
evaluated their lives as more satisfying than did low temporal
distancers. And, almost by definition, the former worried less than the
latter.
You might be thinking, “When stressed out, taking a long view is
easier said than done,” and I heartily agree. That is why with this
research, as with all research and professional advice, you must filter its
implications through the colander of your ego strength—your history,
temperament, personality, and environments. When confronted with past
stressors, when and why were you able or unable to adopt a long-view?
What elements of your temperament (e.g., frustration tolerance) were assets or
liabilities during that time? Which features of your personality (e.g.,
openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, or neuroticism)
played a part? And, finally, what environments (natural, fabricated, or interpersonal) helped or hindered?
By scrutinizing your ego strength and learning from your worst and
best experiences you will be able to put stressors into perspective, not only
time-wise but in many other ways, such as by knowing which specific strategies
have worked and will work for you. You also must strive to
problem solve and to manage your emotions.
Those skills, too, will profit from whatever ego strength insight you
can manage and from your intelligent application of the insights.
Reference
Bruehlman-Senecal, Emma; Ayduk, Özlem; John, Oliver P.
(2016). Taking the Long View: Implications of Individual Differences in
Temporal Distancing for Affect, Stress Reactivity, and Well-Being.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, July 11, No Pagination Specified.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000103.
No comments:
Post a Comment