To say that something is "subjective" often is to imply that
it is of questionable validity. Our
culture places a premium on "objective" data. For instance, virtually all of the behavioral
and health sciences insist that only"evidenced-based' research is worthy
of dissemination. Therefore, at first,
it seems contradictory to discuss findings derived from studies of
"subjective well-being." Yet,
such studies generally are accepted as reasonable by most psychologists. This perhaps is because the subjective
well-being opinions of research subjects are collected and evaluated with
scientific rigor and satisfy state of the art academic standards. For the most part, well-being data is
comprised of single or combined assessments of thoughts, feelings, and
behaviors elicited from the research subjects and/or from persons who know them
intimately.
Subjective well-being (SWB) data quantify an individual’s general sense
of how well their life is proceeding.
SBW, then, depends on relatively chronic, versus episodic, features of
life. Because everyone occasionally has
an especially “bad day” or an especially “good day,” SWB must be assessed over
time to determine one's modal satisfactions and feelings.
So what is assessed in deciding SWB?
Certainly, the assessment needs to be multifaceted. Some common, obvious determinants of SWB, for
instance, are an individual’s health, income, and sense of competence and
control. The issue of control is quite
salient because some psychologists have asserted that much of SWB is
genetically determined. If so, one might
conclude that there is little or nothing that we can influence that will make
an appreciable difference in our SWB.
If “It’s all in the genes,” our
well-being is preordained.
Recent studies, however, have challenged the contention that genes are
primary for SWB. For instance, Diener et
al. (2017) cite research by Nes and Roysamb (2015) suggesting that non-genetic
factors account for most of our SWB. This supports the commonsense notion
regarding the importance of health practices, employment, and marital
quality. Relationships are especially
central in that good interpersonal relationships facilitate in us a strong
tendency to behave in ways that promote physical and mental health. And the more physically and mentally healthy
we are, the more SWB we experience.
The self determination theory (SDT) of Edward L. Deci and Richard Ryan
(2002) affords a rather succinct system for understanding and applying much of
the SWB research data. According to SDT,
three major relatively controllable factors are critical for SWB: autonomy,
competence, and relatedness. Autonomy of
course is synonymous with personal control, and personal control is a
prerequisite for both initiating and maintaining efforts that facilitate a
lifestyle consistent with SWB. But autonomy alone is not sufficient. Competence enables one to take prerequisite
autonomy and to translate it into actions that actually effect the desired
outcomes. For SWB purposes, relatedness
has two aspects. On the one hand,
relatedness refers to an individual's
ability to interact constructively with other people to achieve health
and happiness. But think of relatedness
also as the extent to which she/he experiences a compelling attachment not only
to people, but also to SWB-related thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. When relatedness is strong in that sense, the
individual better understand what she/he is doing, and, therefore, can make
more committed, informed, and integrated SWB-relevant choices.'
The take-away of course is that you you will feel content, and even well, to the extent that you foster your personal competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Those are health-promoting qualities whether they are subjectively or objectively true.
The take-away of course is that you you will feel content, and even well, to the extent that you foster your personal competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Those are health-promoting qualities whether they are subjectively or objectively true.
References
Diener, Ed; Heintzelman, Samantha J.; Kushlev, Kostadin; Tay, Louis;
Wirtz, Derrick; Lutes, Lesley D.; Oishi, Shigehiro.(2017). Findings all psychologists should know from
the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie
canadienne, 58,2, 87-104.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (Eds.), (2002). Self-determination theory
and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and
well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
No comments:
Post a Comment