Virtually everyone has
heard by now that a walking activity promotes physical and emotional
well-being. In medical parlance, walking
is preventive physical and emotional medicine in its three major incarnations. Walking is primary physical prevention because
it enables some of us to avoid the onset of a disease, such as obesity; it is
secondary prevention if it short-circuits a disease in its early stage, as can
be true for hypertension; and it is tertiary prevention when it enables someone
with a full blown disease, such as insulin dependent diabetes, to reduce their
medication dosage. Walking is primary emotional illness prevention when an
individual learns to walk to avoid becoming angry; secondary prevention if
he/she takes a long walk as anger just starts to accelerate; and tertiary, in
the event that it helps a person rapidly “cool off” after having experienced an
angry outburst.
Although walking’s
physical and emotional health benefits are widely known and promoted, some
people might not like to walk and do so grudgingly at best. Let’s consider one physical example and one
emotional example demonstrating that even reluctant ones should walk the walk.
There certainly are
people for whom walking is uncomfortable, causing their feet or legs to ache. No one would fault a person diagnosed with peripheral
vascular disease (PAD), a disorder that produces muscle cramps during walking, for
being reluctant to walk. However, Dr. Mary
M. McDermott and her colleagues (2013) have produced research suggesting that walking
might be precisely what they should do.
Their PAD patients
participated in a six month program in which they walked as a group 1 day per
week for 45 minutes and 5 days for 50 minutes each day at home. Those who experienced severe pain while walking
were advised to rest, and then to continue walking after the pain subsided. Patients
who completed the program functioned significantly better than their control
counterparts in distance walked, walking time, and general physical activity
level.
What about people
disinclined to walk for exercise, but not subject to ambulation-associated
pain? Would one expect them to derive
any positive emotional benefit from walking?
Given my purpose in writing this post, you will not be surprised to
learn that the following research-based answer, courtesy of Jeffery Miller and
Zlatan Krizan (2016), is in the affirmative.
Without providing any
hint as to why, Miller and Krizan had half their university student subjects
sit and the other half walk as part of a situation that was presented as a test
of how unfamiliar and familiar environments affect people emotionally. All sat while watching a 10 minute video of unfamiliar
Chinese landscapes. Then the sit-group
watched a video of familiar campus sites while the walk-group walked to visit
the same video sites that their comrades merely sat and watched. Results suggested, first, that non-exercise-enacted
walking increased positive feelings despite the incidental nature of the
walking, and second, that walking had the potential to overcome negative
emotions, such as feelings of dread or boredom.
Miller and Krizan offer two
major implications worth mentioning. They
suggest that walking can promote positive emotions, such as joviality and
vigor. They also support the notion that
even people reluctant to be physical active derive inadvertent emotional and
physical benefits from motoric engagement.
In sum, the human body
was made to move. We feel better
physically and mentally when we are in motion.
Walking—perhaps the simplest, most perfect deliberate and incidental
exercise—provides primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention benefits. Whether you want to reduce your illness risk,
reduce incipient illness, or ameliorate full-blown illness, walking can confer
major benefits even for persons who suffer manageable exercise-related
discomfort or who are disinterested in exercise.
AMA, 310,
1,57-65. Retrieved from
doi:10.1001/jama.2013.7231.
Miller, Jeffrey Conrath;
Krizan, Zlatan (2016). Walking
Facilitates Positive Affect (Even When Expecting the Opposite). Emotion, April 21. No Pagination Specified.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0040270.
No comments:
Post a Comment