Most of us have
heard some version of the adage, "Show me your company and I'll tell you
who you are" whose elusive roots have been attributed to sources as
diverse as the Bible and Vladimir Lenin. In America, prior to the
end of the 20th century the "who you are" mostly concerned one's
moral standing. Interlocutors wanted to know who could and could not be
trusted, for instance. In your great-grandparents' day, average citizens
rarely were interested in details regarding minutiae of your sexuality or politics.
That did not seem important to most of them. By default, people passively
were accepted as having some complex qualities and preferences that were
"nobody else's business."
That attitude
promoted cultural norms that encouraged accepting people as they were in the
here-and-now. A new acquaintance need not pass some overarching litmus
test that incorporated a host of criteria about irrelevant personal
preferences, such as gender beliefs or political affiliation. Individuals were
free to isolate their gender and political ideas to the interactions with the
few people in the few places where those issues were relevant and timely.
Accordingly, Americans were comfortable in the company of persons with whom
they chose to interact because they presumed that they did not need to pass a
comprehensive, generic personality test in order to be accepted as a “good
person.” You could disclose to others what you wanted to, and keep
private that which you did not want to disclose. No one feature of your being
defined the totality of you.
Sadly, the
freedom to be yourself in all your complexity increasingly has been under
assault; no doubt in large part due to the internet in general and to social
media in particular. Few
people today are willing and/or able to avoid deliberately or inadvertently
revealing aspects of their identity that some powerful person or group will
condemn. The condemnation often is due to one small feature of your being
that causes you to be saddled with a negative, global stereotype.
Some social psychologists refer
to the problem as the attributing of a negative
"mega-identity." Your mega-identity was not your sole,
autonomous creation. It was crafted by adherence to rules dictated by
so-called influencers, such as politicians, actors, or sports figures.
Mega-identity defines you not only by your attitudes toward political parties
and gender but also such factors as race, religion, geographic location, and
more. Once you are labeled, some people will condemn or support you,
regardless of the totality of your being; “your company” will define you in
ways your great-grandparents never could have imagined.
No comments:
Post a Comment