You have decided how to conduct your
lifestyle and your health will be affected accordingly. "Wait a minute," you say, “I have made no such
decision.”
But, of course, you have.
There are at least three ways to decide
on a healthful or non-healthful lifestyle.
You can make a deliberate, conscious decision about what you should do. You can fail to make a deliberate, conscious decision,
and unconsciously enact health-inducing or health-impairing behavior. Or you can make a conscious or unconscious default
decision by merely behaving in health-relevant ways that are most convenient at
any given point in time.
The choice of deliberate, enacted, or default
decisions often is determined by your emotions. The more you understand the connections
between decision making and emotions, the better. So, let’s review what Jennifer S. Lerner ,
Ye Li , Piercarlo Valdesolo ,
and Karim Kassam (2015)
have to teach us about the issue.
The group points out the
well-accepted notion that emotions usually predispose us to a particular
action. For instance, fear often causes
us to flee from the source of our fear, and anger often incites us to strike
out against its source. Lerner et al.
add that emotions also bias us to view the environment in ways consistent with
the emotion. If we are fearful, we perceive
the environment as threatening, and if we are angry we regard the environment
as frustrating. Emotions then encourage
us both to perceive the environment and to act within it in a manner than is
emotion-consistent.
Several other important researched-based
features of decision making and emotion are emphasized that are germane to our
discussion. First, emotions influence decisions
in predictable ways. Second, some of the
influences are integral to the emotions and some are incidental. Third, features specific to a given
emotion exerts particular influences.
Fourth, emotions can affect the depth of thought, the content of
thought, and/or the content of a given goal. Fifth, it is the interaction among
the intellectual and motivational features of a given emotion that determines
the extent and nature of that emotion’s influence on decision making. Sixth, when emotions unconsciously
prompt us, if we are aware of that prompt we frequently can use our
conscious rationality to modify the emotional affect.
The seventh research-based feature
of decision making and emotion warrants separate discussion because it directs
us toward helpful strategies. Number
seven suggests that unwanted emotional influences can be combated in several
ways. One way is for us to learn how to
reduce emotional intensity. Another is
to ensure that the emotion that does occur provides as little influence as
possible. Finally, we can cultivate a
proclivity toward emotions opposite to the problematic ones. Applying the Learner et al. advice, when you
must make a stressful decision and you feel yourself becoming angry, you might
take a walk before finalizing that decision (reducing intensity). You also could accept your anger, realize
that the anger will only interfere with your decision, and make a dispassionate
list of the pros and cons involved in the decision (anger provides as little influence
as possible). Or, knowing that you are
prone to anger, you can learn to see the source of your anger as weak,
irrelevant, and not worth getting yourself upset (cultivating feelings opposed
to anger).
The bottom line is this:
decisions are either deliberate, enacted,
or default. And all three possibilities can
be powerfully determined by your emotions.
Be aware of the way you make health-relevant decisions. Be proactive and conscious with them. And know that your emotions will be central
in how you intentionally or inadvertently structure your lifestyle.
Reference
Lerner ,
L., Li , Y., Valdesolo ,
P., & Kassam , K. (2015).
Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of
Psychology, 66, 799-823.
No comments:
Post a Comment